In 2026, Spiderman makes an offhand comment about having every camera in the city scanning faces for a particular bad guy, the chief of police he is talking to cracks a joke saying that seems illegal. This is about Flock cameras.
The idea that attention is the base resource of an entire ecosystem and that different media orgs evolve to fill different niches eating that attention is a load bearing metaphor
Cannot tell you how much I appreciate taking the ecosystem metaphor seriously. So many people just invoke it as a vague "look at these interconnected actors" idea, when there are often very real predator/prey, symbiotic/parasitic, and other relationships.
I've long maintained a Modest Proposal of simply sacrificing everything in Nevada outside of Vegas and Reno to build enough solar capacity to power everything forever, I see no way this could possibly backfire ecologically or economically
imo the politically expedient thing for blue states to do re: datacenters is not outright bans but to make them provide their own transmission. If you're right and this is the tech of the future this is a trivial expenditure, if you're wrong then at least you've done something for the future!
As someone who had never heard of Emily Wilson I feel like I'm losing my mind, why do we all have to talk about one author's take on this millennia-old story?? When I was a kid I read an illustrated children's book version of it, should we ask its author whether the violence was too graphic?
You have 100K in savings, I offer you a coin flip that, if you win you get a million dollars, if you lose you lose 500K. You are absolutely in the right to refuse my offer because being 400K in debt is *much* worse than being a millionaire is good and both scenarios are equally likely
Most of the papers aren't even that bad but the bibliography's summary/speaker's takeaway from them is literally just wrong, like, hallucinated conclusions that the papers don't even touch on!