Профиль

andy burnham just appointed a segregationist, a conversion ‘therapy’ advocate, and the architect of a new section 28 as labour party chair. but sure let’s all whine about a t-shirt and talk about how andy burnham is doing things differently. 🙄 im surrounded by assholes.

On this, are names I have seen in the past telling trans people to stop being so critical of labour. Hence my general confusion on this, usually rapid criticism of Polanski is coupled with an absolute defence of labour.

Well, the thing is, i have seen so much more outrage over a social media post from Polanski than I have regarding the institutional transphobia of the british government. Like, the press seem very reluctant to do that or call out farage. I see a lot of people calling for consequences for Polanski

Should nigel farage's career be over for all the stuff he has endorsed and supported, for inciting riots?

Lol, I am curious though, here you are calling for accountability for Polanski, but what about the transphobes in the labour government who endorsed the Cass review and have been implimenting it. Should that not end their careers for actual tangible harm?

🩸 He is saying the word incorrectly on purpose you daft fools. He does it so that you'll focus on the grammar aspect and not the exterminating an entire demographic of human beings part. You are letting this depraved freak lead you around by your nostrils and you are absolutely pathetic for it.

I never thought about this, but now you say that. It makes so much sense, the amount of times he has done it while saying the most reprehensible shit, and all the press do is focus on, oh he said the word incorrectly

The thing is, nigel farage has faced no accountability for anything he has ever said and Zack Polanski is getting more flack over this. So forgive me for feeling like all this outrage on this t-shirt is pretty snide centrist bullshit.

I loved that man when I was introduced to his satirical music; we shall appropriate all his work, that is what I am getting as the final takeaway here

See my vote would have been for Poisoning Pigeons in the park

for hours. The problem with a lot of AI products and services, is they are presented as something that can do everything. People argue for it as the great equaliser in Art and writing, when it is not that.

AI adds nothing to the creative process imo, like, I don't trust AI in my writing process, I don't trust it in my drawing process. Photography is helpful, in which it is both a new artistic medium and it can help in the traditional process. Using a photo to capture a model, they need not sit around

I forgot they did that; it is like a common theme. They make this plea of poverty over the whole situation consistently.

It's not enough to be against AI, you need to be pro art. You need to be a champion of the art you love, you need to share that passion and joy, and do what you can to support the artists who make it, because it's not enough to hate AI, to hate what it's doing to art and media; you gotta love.

I have used AI in my professional life, in interesting ways for managing IP portfolios and collating portfolio data. But that AI technology, is not being developed by companies like OpenAI and Anthropic with all their VC money.

AI is loading creative spaces with slop, making it harder for artists to get their work noticed. When I was doing my masters degree, we did a class on tech regulation and the common theme we discussed was how law moves at a snails pace against technology

Napster was eventually strangled by lawsuits and a change of business models by the music industry. And there are a lot of issues about the music industry to this day that go beyond napster. AI's big problem, is that a lot of tech companies are marketing in a way that undermine creative labour.

That is why I said it is an academic discussion, not actual hard legal principles.

What do the principles Trade Mark and "Passing Off" offer artists as a mean of broader protection. I am coming at this, on a matter of broader legal principles as an academic writing on the subject.

Oh, I know style is not protected by copyright. I have discussed these issues with other academics in the field where we have discussed where does the infringement occur? Does infringement occur on the input, or output? - What metrics do we want to consider