Профиль

An organization that stood up to the Soviet Union, to Guantánamo, to death squads, couldn't withstand one billionaire's private legal war chest and a legal system with no anti-SLAPP protection. The UK is a failing police state ran for the benefit of the wealthy at the expense of scapegoats.

This wordplay trick sucks so bad. I hate it because it's so transparently disingenuous. They'll always lead with a cover of some sort that downplays or obscures their actions and intentions. Then they giggle and laugh. "We don't want to eradicate trans people. We just want sex based riiiights!" no.

Rowling: "I'm just a FEMINIST. I'm standing up for SEX BASED RIGHTS." ADF: "We're just CHRISTIANS. We're standing up for GODLY RIGHTS." The Klan: "We're just WAR VETS. We're standing up for STATES RIGHTS." Jeffrey Dahmer: "I'm just an OMNIVORE. I'm standing up for MEAT ENTHUSIASTS."

No, Jo, you don't "Think these girls are heroines." You think they're a useful vehicle for your latest campaign to exterminate trans people, and will feign care from a several-million dollar yacht, sipping fine wine, laughing at the 'little people' who scurry around when you bark about "womb-ins."

No one will ever convince me that this woman who has a yacht, a Scottish castle, a billion dollar fortune, and a media empire, actually gives a shit about anyone other than her own ego and her own bank account. Tell me, how many women's causes, other than blatant transphobia, has she spoken about?

JKR doesn't care about girls. They're a means to an end, to her, just meaningless, faceless, dirty nobodies she can use, along with her endless wealth, to hurt people she's self-brainwashed herself into hating. She pointed the X right wing indoctrination machine at her own face and turned it on.

same as those who claim "not be scientists" when anyone brings up intersex people or they act like trans people were invented by Joebama in 2012. Normal people respond to seeing trans women in '33 Weimar by saying "oh, wow." They don't scream 'fake!' and use astroturfed slogans to deflect criticism.

Using girls as objects for this campaign against rights is a cynical attempt to game people's emotions, but it's also the biggest piece of evidence that these demons don't care at all for the people they claim to be protecting. All while at least 2 of them are arrested for trading CSAM every week.

I'm so tired of the worst people using children as props for their fundamentalist extermination campaign. The greatest illusion they've been able to pull off is convincing everyone they care about girls and women. If these people cared about women, the Epstein files wouldn't be in a hole somewhere.

The parapet one is also the only rule in that cluster with an actual stated reason that works in contemporary times: so nobody falls off your dangerous and rickety roof. It's a building code. That one they could keep and it would do some good for tradies and shinglers at least.

For non-bible people, Deuteronomy also includes rules against: mixed fabrics (22:11) sowing two kinds of seed in a vineyard (22:9) a lack of a parapet on your roof (22:8) a lack of tassels on the 4 corners of your cloak (22:12) Nobody at CEA is scoring lawmakers on polyester blends or tassels.

A rep who has a 94% voting record with the "Christian Employers Alliance." Look at what CEA attached to HB 606 and HB 805, both of which Paré voted for: Deuteronomy 22:5, because of course it's the ol' 'deuter. The fundies are here with the prosperity gospel and they want to control how you dress.

Rep. Erin Pare Voting Record & Scorecard | Christian Employers AllianceRep. Erin Pare (R-NC-37) voting record, substantive votes, and Christian Employers Alliance scorecard rating for 2025.staging.bbindex.org

A rule policing whether women look sufficiently like a "woman" enforced by administrators and by parent complaints, falls hardest on Black and Latina women, on butch lesbians, plus-size women, or on anyone whose features or build or hair don't read as white femininity or adhere to those standards.

The CROWN Act exists in about half the states because "professional appearance" standards were being used against Black hair, and it exists because courts kept saying that was lawful. Even if the intent here is just to vindictively target trans people, I would be skeptical to think it'd stop there.

Me waiting for the obvious, telegraphed, poorly executed theft attempt that everyone sees coming: "But Marge, that little guy hasn't done anything yet! Look at him! He's going to do something, and you know it's going to be good!" "Awwwwwwwww!"

Simpsons Italian mafia vs. Japanese mafiaYouTube video by gracefulfoolwww.youtube.com

First they go after smaller groups like Mermaids or Girl Guides, because they can't fight Mould Bucks. Then they go after the Hampstead Ponds, M&S. Fighting over every little instance of inclusion. Surely people are starting to see behind this "WE decide YOUR identity for OUR comfort" charade?

They make mistakes. They start attacking targets that are more popular than they are. They start pushing people around and getting confident that their "ideology" is "winning" when in reality, people just want them to stop and go away because constantly demanding to see other people's junk is weird.

Now I'm waiting for a statement from Tracks Matter's PR person that says passengers should be banned from all station loos because of conductor-based rights.

> dignity, health, safety and respect to our people.” I'm at the point where someone in the British press says "Dignity...and respect" and I feel like a scream is slowly boiling its way up my throat.

I hate how people doing the right thing are penalized because they had the decency to do everything that was asked and now, they get persecuted. This should be the biggest clue that the admin is not interested in keeping anyone safe or about "laws." It's just bigotry and hatred wrapped in procedure.