It is Friday.
Профиль
Katie Bergh
Профиль VivelySNAP/WIC/Child Nutrition at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Come for the corgi pictures, stay for the food assistance policy.
And here’s the entirely foreseeable result of a law that imposes massive penalties if states give families the wrong amount of SNAP benefits, but no penalties if they make it virtually impossible for eligible families to get benefits in the first place.
Nebraska ExaminerICYMI: May through June marked the sharpest single-month participation drop — nearly 6,000 — since at least 2014, says watchdog group Nebraska Appleseed. From Cindy Gonzalez
I would quibble with this headline because an administration that "wants to tackle fraud" would probably be a little more interested in whether the "fraud" they've identified is, in fact, actually fraud.
PoliticoThe Trump administration wants to tackle food aid fraud. Conservative states have issues with the approach.
There has (rightly) been a focus on Arizona, which has seen the steepest decline in SNAP participation. But huge drops are happening in other states in the wake of these cuts. From July 2025 to June 2026, SNAP participation fell 21% in Louisiana. 21% in Florida. 20% in Illinois.
In the 11 months after the reconciliation law was enacted, the number of people receiving SNAP in Kansas fell by 13 percent. Almost half of the more than 25,000 Kansans who lost benefits were children.
KSNT 27 NewsFood banks in Kansas are dealing with increased demand as more and more people lose access to food stamps and assistance.
You can bookmark this one for the next time a senior administration official baselessly claims that states "just take your word for it" and "don't even check" when people apply for SNAP. www.azcentral.com/story/grocer...
We now have data from 19 states showing how many fewer children are receiving SNAP in the wake of these cuts. The steepest drops in those states: -49% in AZ (-182,058 kids) -23% in LA (-82,064 kids) -18% in TX (-317,316 kids) -18% in MA (-61,647 kids)
🚨NEW: In the 9 months after last year’s reconciliation law enacted unprecedented SNAP cuts, the number of people receiving SNAP fell by more than 4.5 million. Based on available data, we estimate that at least 1.5 million fewer kids are receiving SNAP. www.cbpp.org/research/foo...
🚨NEW: In the 9 months after last year’s reconciliation law enacted unprecedented SNAP cuts, the number of people receiving SNAP fell by more than 4.5 million. Based on available data, we estimate that at least 1.5 million fewer kids are receiving SNAP. www.cbpp.org/research/foo...
"It’s an existential threat. States are absolutely contemplating a world in which SNAP isn’t available."
Lauren BauerAnd now Arizona joins Alabama in admitting that the OBBBA cost shift policy could force them to drop out of SNAP period. www.nytimes.com/2026/07/20/u...
Exactly this. People who want SNAP caseloads to return to where they were 25 years ago should probably explain why they want a highly effective & efficient anti-hunger program to reach a much smaller share of the people who need it.
Pam HerdThe NYT piece notes SNAP use doubled since the early 2000s to explain cuts. But SNAP take up was artificially low. In the 90s ~80% of the eligible received benefits. This dropped to 52% by 2002. Bush admin worked on it. We were back at ~90%. We're about to see take-up among the eligible plummet.
I talk a lot about states adding "red tape" & "bureaucratic obstacles" in response to federal SNAP cuts, which are wholly inadequate terms to describe “give us documentary evidence of your panhandling income, even though we know those records don't exist." www.nytimes.com/2026/07/20/u...
Yeah, so the problem is that "the number of individuals receiving benefits" nationwide has suddenly been changing very quickly and in only direction (down!) following the enactment of unprecedented cuts & during a period the economy hasn't improved. www.yahoo.com/news/article...
As kids across the country lose SNAP in the wake of these cuts, a reminder that one study found that every $1 invested in SNAP for children returns $62 in value over their lifetimes due to a range of benefits - improved educational outcomes, higher earnings in adulthood & more.
Katie BerghNEW: A year after H.R. 1 enacted the deepest SNAP cuts in history, the number of children receiving SNAP nationwide has likely dropped by more than 1.5 million, based on our analysis of available data from 17 states. www.cbpp.org/research/foo...
A member of North Carolina's congressional delegation at a SNAP hearing last year: "I find it incredibly misleading when my colleagues on the other side of the aisle claim that counties are going to bear the cost of this legislation." Now:
NC Health NewsA federal shift will require North Carolina counties to pay more to administer SNAP while navigating expanded work requirements, more paperwork and the risk of costly payment errors. Full story: www.northcarolinahealthnews.org/2026/07/10/n...
Let's be clear about the consequences for kids when their families need SNAP to afford groceries but no longer get that help:
Katie BerghNEW: A year after H.R. 1 enacted the deepest SNAP cuts in history, the number of children receiving SNAP nationwide has likely dropped by more than 1.5 million, based on our analysis of available data from 17 states. www.cbpp.org/research/foo...
More stories of struggling families in AZ who have lost SNAP as the state responds to deep federal cuts: They can't get through on overloaded phone lines They're waiting for hours at DES offices & still not getting help They're facing never-ending requests for more documentation
291,000+ kids in Texas. 195,000+ kids in Arizona. 156,000+ kids in California. 83,000+ kids in Louisiana. 61,000+ kids in Massachusetts. 50,000+ kids in Ohio. 41,000+ kids in Michigan. 23,000+ kids in Alabama. 21,000+ kids in New Jersey. 17,000+ kids each in Maryland & Missouri.
Katie BerghNEW: A year after H.R. 1 enacted the deepest SNAP cuts in history, the number of children receiving SNAP nationwide has likely dropped by more than 1.5 million, based on our analysis of available data from 17 states. www.cbpp.org/research/foo...