BASH: How do you prepare for next pandemic? RFK Jr: We did almost everything wrong B: But what about now? K: We need to protect our rights B: ? K: During covid we dismantled our rights B: But I'm asking what *to* do K: You were part of the problem B: You want to sit here and attack me?
Профиль
Jamal Greene
Профиль VivelyDwight Professor of Law, Columbia Law School. Ex-DOJ/OLC. Becoming familiar with your game. How Rights Went Wrong available at Bookshop.org (https://tinyurl.com/se32my4r), Amazon (https://tinyurl.com/3vbcfwa4), or a decent public library.
Read my colleague Jeff Gordon on how the Twenty Second Amendment (presidential term limits) should have informed the Supreme Court's views on presidential accountability in Trump v. Slaughter. balkin.blogspot.com/2026/07/trum...
Balkinization: Trump v. Slaughter and the Twenty-Second AmendmentA group blog on constitutional law, theory, and politicsbalkin.blogspot.comCurious what other law profs think of Sag's argument for closed book.
Orin KerrOver at his personal blog, Emory Law Professor @matthewsag.bsky.social offers some very interesting thoughts on structuring law school exams in an era of AI and common extra-time accommodations. matthewsag.com/ai-accommoda...
Hard to argue with this. Absolute heartland of the sort of thing that should result in multiple impeachments.
Jennifer N. VictorToday, in violations of the rule of law that would be sufficient for impeachment in any other American presidency but aren't in this one because pathological partisan loyalty has rotted the constitutional order:
I've become convinced that more US law schools need to lean in to comparative public law. Putting Wurman to one side, I've been struck over the years at how little US-trained lawyers know about other constitutional cultures. Clichéd, I know, but this one's true.
Michael KaranicolasWurman’s statement is also just factually wrong. Literally every country in the world, apart from a handful of exceptions like North Korea, has vibrant civil society groups who advocate for democracy and human rights. Nobody is “culturally incapable” of constitutional self government.
Whatever happens with this suit from here on, Judge Williams's opinion is an important historical record of the President and DOJ's behavior.
Chris GeidnerBREAKING: Federal judge finds that Trump's IRS suit was improper because Trump controlled both sides of the litigation. Judge Kathleen Williams also sanctions Trump's lawyers, issues monetary sanctions, and harshly criticizes DOJ's "untenable" conduct. More to come at Law Dork: www.lawdork.com
The juxtaposition here of the normative atop the prerogative state is so pure and disorienting.
ACLUNEW: We submitted a public comment opposing the Trump administration's proposal to cut off funding to local governments and organizations that don't bow to the president's political agenda. This would threaten critical services for people across the country.