Профиль

Eternal September

Not only did the headline writer leave out the Oxford comma, but they also left out the article "the" before Shah of Iran. Very sloppy.

its easy as 1 2 3, its easy as doe* ray me. ... *dough

9/7 so a combination of copy paste error, the second 'at birth' in the label and the identify fields showing at all, AI coding error. is my guess.

Im guessing, sex? didnt say. they fill out later, looked like a guy. 'at birth' maybe you are invited to say. visually identified got 'at birth' accidentally pasted. extra 'at birth' copy paste error, showing visual identify, AI coding error.

8/7 Me here, visually identified ethnicity i can see, visually identified sex, ok, like guy showed up wearing mens clothes, but visually identified sex at birth, sounds like dr shrugs, could be a boy, could be a girl, ill take my best guess. Why use same phraseology, but with the at 'at birth part'

7/7 use are supposed to be hidden from the applicant entirely and reserved strictly for HR managers to check off later if someone refuses to answer.

6/7 behalf for compliance reporting. The Glitch: In proper software design, fields prefixed with "Visually Identified" or tags meant for admin-only

5/7 This is the most Orwellian part of the database. Under strict federal contractor compliance guidelines (like the EEOC), if an employee or applicant refuses to self-identify their race or sex, the employer is legally required to make a "visual observation" or "guess" and fill it out on their

4/7 public-facing application view. Here is what those specific backend fields actually mean in HR data architecture: Sex vs. Sex at Birth: One is your current legal or designated marker, while "sex at birth" is the baseline historical record. "Visually Identified" Sex, Ethnicity, or Race:

3/7 The llm says about your post, Those labels come directly from enterprise human capital software configuration templates (specifically backend database tags from Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM/Talent Management systems) that somehow leaked raw administrative fields straight into the

2/7 with tags like EEO_Sex, Fed_Sex, or Federal_Reporting_Sex. Someone configuring the online application form accidentally mapped the raw database label or internal system tag directly onto the user-facing web view instead of a human-readable label like "Select sex for federal reporting purposes.

1/7 An llm says about a reply comment to your post, Many HR systems pull demographic fields from standardized federal reporting templates (such as IPEDS data required by the National Center for Education Statistics, or federal EEOC codes). In the backend database, fields are often labeled

It's probably partially due to the fact that he says Iran like 'I ran' and that rhymes with Japan and therefore he's just mixing them up in his mind because they rhyme together, but really he should just start saying Iran appropriately. www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIj1...

White men, am i right Ladies?

I don't get the joke.

Remember the pic of Trump saluting the North Korean General.

Me and the web chat decided this is just the scaffolding subcontractor. Only tools they got are some hammers. One truck.

Time saving is good, i dieted once, gained it back, but, the more time you spend cooking, and eating, the more weight you lose.

I have to say I laughed, at the end, there. Still am. Oh, now I'm just smiling.