Профиль

The 12-24 months was based on the age of the kid - an 8 yo is for sure going to want to wait longer than a 14yo!

There's also going to be some family history stuff going on in there. Biology is a mess! Basically I know just enough to think it needs a proper study and there are probably some pitfalls to winging it.

My guess - and it's a guess! - is that it would be 12-24 months later, because you want to start blockers slightly before things get properly going and there's a little bit of evidence that later puberty slightly benefits overall longevity.

Also probably to figure out the "best" age for puberty onset (or signs of metabolic readiness? Not my area) because like I didn't get my period until I was almost fifteen - my HRT "schedule" isn't the same as somebody who started at eight.

To be fair, we do not have good dosing for that and it does do harm. We should be starting teens on *low-dose* HRT under close supervision.

If this happened on my flight, I'd be asking the flight attendant (loudly) what the airline's policy is on preventing harassment based on protected characteristics... Remember folks, (lack of) religion is a protected characteristic. Flight attendants hate these people and need cover to remove them.

If he wants to be treated like a potential prime minister then he needs to act like it. Either you're a serious political party or you're not.

Are you telling me I actually can buy leather-bound books with my leather-bound pounds??

No energy certificate, which is very sus.

My *extremely* cynical take is that it's Taylor Farms (again) and they're trying to divert attention from the "false positive" - if you've already bribed the President, why not a media mogul or two?

My understanding is that the CDC know good and well how, the question is WHERE.

You kinda did, yes. Or does having (pretty distant, by now) cousins in the US convey mystical knowledge of their neighbours? Huge if true.

Bubbie, so did mine. You're not special for being a white guy with a distant cousin.

I think some of it (in the UK at least) is because the NHS runs a massive public information campaign saying "don't share meds it's DANGEROUS". (I got it every time I picked up a prescription). I believe they started in the wake of discovering quite how much Thalidomide was being passed around.

This is not life or death however. I think the medication thing is so jarring because it's actively bad practice if the priors aren't true - dosing somebody with expired meds and no MD is... not entirely safe. It's not just saying "illegal is good", it's saying "unsafe is good".

I think it's important to deface racist party propaganda (if it's safe to do so, non-citizens shouldn't get a criminal record in front of Mahmood etc etc) because it counteracts the narrative that the party's opinions are valid or accepted. They're trying to create hostility and should fail.

I think everyone who thinks seriously about ethics knows that there are laws they'd break in some circumstances. I'd deface a Reform UK election poster, you know? In a perfect system, sure, the laws would have a 1:1 overlap with ethics. But... well, if you know where that's at I'll gladly move!

My teacher just asked me "what does 'pyrrhic victory' mean?" and when I explained (kinda badly, I was 12 lol) he gave me the points and never said another word about my vocabulary.

DO NOT OPEN THAT EMAIL. Some of the transcription bots operate like a virus and will then "help" by running in the background of every zoom call.

www.bbc.com/sport/footba...