Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Профиль

Damien_Souleater

Профиль Vively

.... you use to have to enter phone numbers if you were a UK/EU user to set up a WoW account back during vanilla to verify you were in fact in the UK/EU it is not that new for blizzard besides they can see the direction laws are going easier to get shit done now that risk expansive last min shit.

010

well done ^^

110

the writing and lore quality of WoW has gone down hill fast and hard the fact is the whole elf evolved from trolls and trolls from native life on the planet now haranir could be proto trolls or a split from proto trolls but given the lore about trolls is from past panels and from titan keepers..

000

my guess is world soul is being used as a way to soft retcon and soft reboot WoW so that the new teams can actually take it in the direction they want and hope people forget the original law i also suspect a lot of the current writing may also be AI with how bad some of it has been. 2/2

000

the fact is they lost most if not all of the original writing/lore teams and most of the peeps who were around in those teams from before and around wrath time when so much of the WoW lore for azeroth was established so now wee have a writing team with no clue and by looks zero skills ?/2

100

i stopped playing back when they had that random villian destroy that main neutral city early in the games life the living world they tried that backfired horribly with the player base so god only knows how much i would have to catch up on XD

010

seems correct XD

010

looks like the perfect work out bud to spot me 😜

010

i mean for crying out loud it has been in official material that night elves evolved from Dark trolls due to the well of eternity's magic like that has been eluded to, outright stated and put in official lore books since vanilla onwards.

010

and yet when i tell people this whole world soul saga is just ret conning vanilla WoW lore i get told i am just being pissy but like.... *points to the literal retcons*

110

well given we now know he ASKED for the hospital thing and that he has committed numerous crimes including theft, blackmail and harassment of private citizens... yes i think i did have something you still happy with your stance?

100

sooo your comment is looking pretty foolish now we know the hospital thing was what HE asked for, that he has been released and is now being re-trailed for JAIL and that he has commited numerous crimes including against private citizens ranging from theft and blackmail to stalking and harassment.

200

yer amazing how all the people who were all up in arms over his sentencing have slunk away when his other crimes came to light or they keep harping on about the hospitalisation that HE asked for... goes to show how many people don't actually look past headlines -.-

000

the gang he was with was also stalking and harrasing women, stealing crypto wallets from private citizens and stole customer data from BT/EE they were not just punks leaking video games they were con men and criminals and the one sent to hospital was assessed and found to be motivated to carry on.

010

did you even read the article? the gang he was part of was also stealing from individuals by hacking crypto wallets they stalked and harrased women, stole customer data from BT and EE he was not arrested for GTA he was arrested for multiple cyber crimes against private people and companies.

000

that was the best come back you had? parrot and make a childish taunt? you realise the fact you could not actually answer the question says everything right? it means no you would not be on his side if his target was not a corporation, your issue is not with his sentence it is that he was caught.

200

never said it was the courts only had to decide did he commit a cyber crime yes or no target was irrelevant under the law he was arrested under my point is if his target had been a hospital would YOU be so gung ho about defending his actions?

100

ah ha but you did not answer my question would you be so gung ho about defending him if he had? you can't cherry pick what hacking is and is not okay either malicious hacking is bad end of OR you support ANY type of malicious hacking.

100

actually it is since they made mention he was volatile and if he was volatile to the wrong person in prison he could end up dead, at least with a secure hospital he is less likely to get shanked, they will likely make him have mandatory therapy as well and allow more visitation of family and friends

100

because people are trying to say hacking a corporation is fine or saying it is clear the corporations set the sentence, he was arrested under a law that makes hacking of ANY kind illegal private citizen or corpo so the target is irrelevant.

100
Показать ещё