Профиль

Have you tried Elden Ring? I really bounced off Dark Souls and Blood Bourne, got frustrated early on and just quit, but I was able to beat Elden Ring. The open world and ability to summon in basically every boss fight makes it a lot more forgiving, you can just skip shit that is frustrating you.

If the wealthy want to get on board and pay their fair share and support policies that help regular Canadians, they are welcome into the fold. If not, they are working against our best interests and hurting Canadians.

We should, but we need to acknowledge that Carney isn't with us, his allies are corporate elites and the wealthy. My interests aren't aligned with his.

5% GDP is an insane target for our military. The US doesn't spend 5% of it's GDP on defence. The real threats posed by climate change, poverty and access to healthcare kill thousands of Canadians every year. That should be our focus, not some hypothetical future war.

Honestly I think burpees works for this too.

I think he'd do a good job, but I think ideally BJ would be played by someone Jewish.

We can arrest him though. More than that, our government has a legal obligation to carry out the warrant for his arrest issued by the ICC if he enters Canada.

He's a fucking fascist and his SS have killed how many people at this point? But sure he has some kind words to say for the undocumented workers he exploits. Did a horse kick you in the head as a child?

And then you'd be saying "Oh look he's dodging the question, can't even answer it!".

"I condemn Hamas, of course, I have called Oct. 7 what it was, which was a horrific war crime" - Mamdani

He's literally at a press conference unveiling his plan for cheaper groceries. The question asker made it about Israel, not him. His focus is on New Yorkers. Also his rhetoric of "we should arrest people charged with war crimes" is the rhetoric of any moral human being.

Is the leader of Hamas likely to come to NYC? Is the leader of Hamas being supported with military aid by the US?

Cairn was one of the best games I played this year, and there isn't much like it out there. It feels incredibly satisfying to master, and it looks beautiful.

People think he's wrong because saying it's irrational for anyone but a homeless person to take the money is stupid. The number might be less than 70%, but it's certainly much higher than like 0.3%. His opinion lacks nuance.

"Will's contention was never that *no one* should but that fewer should than would." It essentially was, he's said multiple times that unless you're homeless or someone is threatening to kill you, it's an irrational choice. That encompasses like 99.7% of people in the US.

The alternatives that exist are vastly more expensive, because they are specialized devices with a small market, some of them are 10 times the price. I'd prefer to live in a world where aids were given freely, but we aren't there yet. I won't fault blind people for choosing these as an option.

Screen readers aren't able to read words in the surrounding environment. They can't give you a description of the area you are in, or help identify possibly obstacles. I'm pretty skeptical of them, but there are genuine use cases for people with disabilities that aren't met with existing tech.

This is only the same scenario if you value principles, morals and the concept of justice as worthless.

An inherently different question, as it's not just a financial choice, it's a matter of justice and fairness.