Подтверждение аккаунта

Подтвердите e-mail

Чтобы начать пользоваться всеми функциями Vively, нужно подтвердить e-mail.

После перехода по ссылке вернитесь в Vively — доступ включится автоматически.

Профиль

Bénédicte C

Профиль Vively

Biosciences & Tech policy Post about research, innovation, public health, politics & policy making, regulation, disinfo She/Her/Antifacist

⟳ Репост от Bénédicte C

ID physician Anthony Fauci, MD, FIDSA has led with courage, scientific integrity and an unwavering commitment to improving public health. These qualities inspired IDSA to establish the Anthony Fauci Courage in Leadership Award. We thank him for his service to patients, science & the ID community.

Dr. Howard had a similar reaction to this blog. He takes issue with the suggestion that doctors and public health professionals do not distinguish between the MAHA leaders and the patients who listen to them. sciencebasedmedicine.org/why-should-i...

Guests on the “Why Should I Trust You?” Podcast Want to Hang Doctors. Why Should I Trust It?"The actual harsh truth about MAHA is that it is an anti-vaxx, anti-science, pro-diarrhea conspiracy movement. It cloaks its arguments in abstractions about "big pharma" and "free speech" to generatesciencebasedmedicine.org

Admitting to y lobbying Republicans and having "insiders" in the administration, while screeching about Dems not being open enough to their ideas about collaborating with (their imagined) MAHA, is bizarre. Crisis are politically clarifying.

WSITY is a weird project. It does not come off as politically neutral. It's unclear what policy change they are trying to achieve. It's very scolding & angry towards Dems and Public Health professionals. You don't talk that way to allies. It's not even a good science comms podcast.

But not everyone in "public health" has drunk their cool-aid and it pisses WSITY staff off. Is there really a peel-able voting block? Who exactly is being asked to shift their political views: MAHA voters, Dem pols, PH professionals? And many people do NOT want to meet MAHA in the "middle".

The theory of change is, if people working in public health admit their failures, they will be more open to taking MAHA political objectives more seriously and... then they would be, what, be more popular or successful? The carrot for Dems is the promise of peeling off MAHA voters from MAHA pols?

More to the point, who is WSITY funded by? Cause this is what it sounds like: WSITY is political project. It claims that "public health" has failed MAHA voters, and is not trustworthy. WSITY shows often feel like a self-criticism session for public health professionals.

So much anger at "Democrats", from people who seem to be collaborating with Republicans. Democrats abandoned MAHA? "You" are kicking people out of clinics? "You need to demonstrate"? Who is this demonized "you"?

WSITY seems to want to represent the "moms and dads and young people who support RFK Jr because he has given voice to a desire to have someone fight for their health." But also claim they don't like being called MAHA. Who exactly doesn't like the MAHA label?

So the producers of a podcast, which is consistently way over its skis on health science & policy, and which purports to engage with MAHA voters about public health... ...are actually political consultants? Do tell us more about those conversations.

See their comments about #2) RFK Jr's anti vaccine policies and #3) undermining scientific expertise. The WSITY producers are saying they have "their people" in HHS and are talking to Dr. Oz, the HHS Sec in waiting... Are you now??? 🧐

⟳ Репост от Bénédicte C

🧵On @thenewsagents.co.uk yesterday, school closures and the lab leak theory were offered as two examples of legitimate questions that were hard to ask. Both have in fact been asked constantly since 2020. But here's a thread on why I think they were wrong and dangerous on school closures 1/12

⟳ Репост от Bénédicte C

Recent U.S. policy changes threaten the scientific, healthcare, and social infrastructures that support progress in eating disorder research, treatment, and prevention. In a new commentary, authors identify three interconnected areas of concern:

⟳ Репост от Bénédicte C

Volume matters. As @cdelawalla.bsky.social and I wrote, number of comments and outreach from constituents is absolutely important in maintaining Congressional and political attention. This would not be possible without YOUR efforts. Our action center is still live: fight2win.standupforscience.net

Top senators consider blocking Trump’s grant shakeup in spending stopgapIt’s now “up to leadership” whether to head off the controversial changes, Sen. Susan Collins said.www.politico.com
Следующие публикации