Профиль

you could never be #1 motion blur hater as long as I'm alive

I would rather watch a flashback movie of scrooge mcduck

like gen x trying to explain DMA and IRQ settings

honestly my favorite gameboy game, and top 10 games ever someday i'll get around to finishing sword of mana, the gba remake

no. EVERYONE has loved ones that get ill or die; SOME PEOPLE are privileged enough to go fly the family halfway across the world to go see them. the rest of us just get a phone call because there's no way we're getting there baby crying on a plane = rich people problems, period

I don't doubt that you could concoct some preposterous circumstances that makes it a necessity (e.g. all cars within a 50 mile radius are rigged to explode) but all the ones we encounter IN REALITY are just rich people problems and not deserving of sympathy

the criticism is that anyone who "needs" to bring a baby on a plane had other options

I would comment on this but apparently I'm "privileged" for criticizing people who can afford to fly their kids around the world, while my parents packed 4 of us kids into a minivan and drove 8 hours to see family

and yet i will bet any amount of money a digital artist wouldn't be able to tell the difference between pixel art "designed for" crt or lcd displays

it's just blurry take off the Vaseline tinted glasses

i'm gonna need you to press that translate button

they tried this with "kitten court" but not a single cat in history has ever felt remorse for their actions

debate bros don't technically debate either - they deflect, obscure, avoid saying anything they'd have to defend like the plague, and use tired sophistry in lieu of contributing to a discussion, as you've done. logical fallacies aren't only used by debaters; they're also used by pestering trolls

yes, I was hoping for arguments of substance but all you have is sophomoric debate-bro nonsense and you won't be getting your smug self-satisfaction out of me either; you'll be better off setting up a table at a college campus with a big banner saying "you're being emotional: change my mind"

a perfect complement to a wheezing sweaty top

"YOUR STATEMENT DOESN'T MEAN WHAT YOU THINK IT MEANS" "then what does it mean" "WHAT DOES WHAT MEAN? WHAT STATEMENT? YOU'RE NOT IN CONTROL HERE" fucking yikes... you want to be talked to like a real person, maybe don't act like a sundowning chatbot 2

and I asked you to tell me what you think I'm actually saying should I keep a counter of the number of times you dodge the question? 1

not a conflict, not a deflection... but you insist that I'm not saying what my actual words say. so tell me what I'm really saying go ahead and make a falsifiable declaration, I dare you

oh this will be good for a laugh the problem with this line of bullshit you were planning on taking me down... is that an analysis always has to start with a literal interpretation of the text, and you have already consistently failed at that you want to vomit ad hominems but sound smart about it

when he said he wasn't that person any more, I said we'll see. if you want to join the "no one is redeemable" chorus, feel free