Профиль

It’s a group wanting to make changes to the current structures of govt via constitutional means, unlike the constitutional arsonists in power right now. Your priorities are a little off. And abolishing the Senate - or at least changing it to represent people rather than prairie - is an idea w merit.

SC needs to deny the motion with little or no comment.

Which “beginning” state? 1776 CE? The status quo ante 1492 CE? 1000 CE? 10,000 BCE? The point being, blood & soil nationalism is absurd on its face. Throughout human history peoples have shifted, migrated, blended, conquered, been conquered. Oh, and ALL of us came from Africa in the beginning.

Same nutters who believe the tiny percentage of Americans who are Muslim have infiltrated politics in such large numbers that Sharia For All is imminent. 🙄

A 15 year old! Which means somewhere upstream is an adult who failed to secure that firearm and should bear some legal responsibility for this.

Luigi Harvey Oswald

I believe that Moscow has had more than a tiny role in this shift. A lot of effort has been put into anti-foreigner, anti-immigrant propaganda that I doubt is entirely organic.

The weakest, lamest, least morally courageous people you can imagine can become physicians and senators. 🤬

If you’re going to be so risk-averse perhaps that’s a big clue that the military action ought not be undertaken. If a war doesn’t warrant sacrifice, it was never worth fighting in the first place. NB: This one shouldn’t have been started and is possibly the biggest own-goal in American history.

And it was completely predicted by anyone paying an iota of attention to it.

Truth. But he can’t run for President. That Senate seat is much more valuable right now and there’s no guarantee that someone without his intellect and charisma (and that encompasses almost everyone) would hold on to it.

I always thought of Morrisey as a pretentious shit. TIL he’s a pretentious racist shit.

Wow, that’s some bonkers shit. Oh well, maybe he and Bill Maher can pal around together.

Really don’t get the national security thing. Reagan created that myth. If empirical evidence were sufficient, it would have died with him. But too many voters conflate macho posturing and displays of force with solving the problem. The same holds true for the crime issue.

A lot of people are saying it. Just no one whose employment/access to the grift depends on his good graces. Or anyone whose journalism career depends on access to interviews.

Wildfires in Europe were practically unheard of until the last couple of decades. But then, so were 100F temps. When I lived in Germany in the 70s we joked about the 2.4 weeks of warm, sunny summer weather we’d get every year. Would that we could criminalize climate change denialism. It’s deadly.

Rahm Emmanuel will not be the nominee unless the party goes back to the smoke-filled room method of selecting candidates. He’s already begun tacking, cynically, oh so slightly left in recent public statements. I don’t think primary voters will buy it.

How independent was Volcker when he and the Fed raised interest rates in applying shock therapy to refractory inflation during Reagan’s first term? Guess I’m asking whether Reagan should get the “credit” for that.

35% of voters believe this unquestioningly.

Ok, so *even if* his “it’s Biden’s fault” premise is true, it seems mighty irresponsible to launch an attack knowing the depleted state of the arsenal. Reality: these sycophantic simpletons don’t have a clue wtf they’re doing. “Things go BOOM, scary” isn’t the geopolitical strategy they think it is.