Профиль

Color me non-shocked neoliberals get scratched and become bleeding fascists in opposing taxes subsidizing neat and helpful stuff.

It's funny how the correct straightforward answer to getting the state out of something is to decentralize that something entirely. And I was so embarrassingly close to getting that back when I was an "an"cap but was stopped by the whole misguided belief capitalism was divorced from statism.

Let's be real: MAHA members have ease of access to all sorts of certified education sources regarding health. They have refused to willfully look into it and actively do their damndest to make it their self-interest not to. You don't try to reach out to folk who are that keen to spread death.

If we can move past the irrational idea that monarchism is good and desirable then we can move past this beyond stale idea that electorialism is too. It's absolutely doable.

Every Dearborn scapegoater who has the audacity to blame the Muslims in Michigan for Trump — blame godawful neoliberal Democrats deliberately pissing them off instead by the way — but who are also getting pissed at a Muslim man about to pull off underdog victory are the pinnacle of unserious losers.

Karl Popper produced the paradox of tolerance: one of the most effective anti-fascist methods of undermining oppression. Yet he refused to put it into himself by instead willfully helping the Mont Pelerin Society's efforts to normalize fascist enabling neoliberalism. Incoherent as all hell mofo.

Anyone who spouts that beyond garbage "white replacement" nonsense is an unlikeable authoritarian illiterate who actively refuses to do everything they can to not willfully put the phrase "population dynamics" into a web search engine. The right can't research stuff they demand other people do.

So the new Bluesky CEO is just as much of an unlikeable fascism enabling neoliberal as his predecessor was.

A left-leaning Muslim like Mamdani winning New York against an incumbent neoliberal was an underdog victory that broke half of the brains of right-wing Democrats. So what'll happen when another left-leaning Muslim does the same thing in the same year in Michigan? Fascists are gonna bleed but good.

Any neoliberal who tries the "big tent" talking point is admitting, tongue in fascist enabling mouth, that they despise the paradox of tolerance. They hate it applied to them by folk who actually clear the minimum bar in opposing the authoritarianism they support. It's a weak whine. Ignore it.

"Democratic socialists will destroy the Democrats." If the DSA was a genuinely radical anti-authoritarian group, I'd be gleefully supporting them if that was their actual intention. But, no, they want to make the party center-left. And if it gets destroyed from that attempt, cool, I'll take it.

Submissively licking the boot of authoritarians when they demand it will still result in you getting kicked by them anyway.

Taking up firearms, or whatever weapon you can get a hold of, against fascism is GOOD. That is applaudable anti-authoritarian behavior. So, of course, the fascist enabling neoliberals are gonna absurdly hate on such rational behavior.

The question of whether you support open or closed borders is a false dichotomy of choice. There's another option that actually does qualify as the absolutely correct one. Borders are fantasy used to undermine the ability to travel freely. They're a fiction that can neither be shut nor closed.