Amusing Pseudonym1 авг., 01:40So when the US Attorney's Office "presented the grand jury with evidence" of vandals, what exactly was it?
Amusing Pseudonym1 авг., 01:37The DOJ's filing says that the US Attorney's Office "presented the grand jury with evidence" that the damage was done by vandals. I'd be curious to know what that 'evidence' of something that didn't happen was. 🤔
Amusing Pseudonym1 авг., 01:34So the US Attorney's Office "presented the grand jury with evidence" that did not, in fact, exist? 🤔
Amusing Pseudonym31 июл., 21:58I was surprised that there seem to be no color photographs of their original gilding in 1951. (Not online, anyway.)
Amusing Pseudonym31 июл., 21:56I missed the minstrel connection; took the gloves as a general cultural appropriation gag.
Amusing Pseudonym31 июл., 00:31If I'm reading that correctly, an appointment is made to fill the vacancy in each of the three scenarios put forth?
Amusing Pseudonym29 июл., 17:16At this point I would settle for them providing any documented case of 86 being used how they claim, whether Comey was involved or not. 😆