Профиль

“Takes out … a lot of the human error”? By what, multiplying it???

That is good, but I’m not so much looking for an overview as double checking one or two specific questions just so I’m not being needlessly unfair

Very!!! Could you put us in touch? I’m looking to do some fact checking for a future @inbedwiththeright.bsky.social episode…

There are a great many people at my workplace who I imagine would be very helpful with this if they weren’t so busy trying to thwart the Jones boys

(Deliberately asking this on Bluesky because I’m not looking for *that* kind of Schmitt-fan 😂)

Ralph Wiggum was a fan tho

Why is Bari leaving money on the table by not channeling his white hot energy into a correspondent position

That was the joke, but it actually turns out not!

I don’t get it, was George Will busy?

I have canceled the plums That were in the icebox

I know!!! Also isn't this a literal @theonion.com cover from back in the day?

Anyone else in SF get weird magazines without ever having subscribed to them? It’s quite the service having my research materials delivered to my house and for free, but I can’t imagine what anyone else would get out of this…

I mean that’s also possible, though it’s likely some group chat that we’re not part of haha

The methodology (such as it is) is the same AI-based petitio principii that the recent “Report on the State of Scholarship” at Vanderbilt employed. The Chronicle was all in on that thing as well…

Manzi’s study made the rounds on the right — College Fix etc. — in March and then got written up in the Chronicle of Higher Ed. I tend to think these things aren’t that conspiratorial: Wouldn’t be shocked if Pamela Paul and the Zeit authors simply subscribe to the same newsletters

Ihr Bauchgefühl mag den Befunden der Forscher widersprechen, aber genau das legt diese Studie *nicht* nahe! Alle sagen, keiner höre diesen Frauen zu; nun ja, diese Forscher habens getan, 231 von ihnen! Ist alles was die sagen jetzt Selbsttäuschung? Oder Propaganda für „Zuhälter und Menschenhändler“?

Wo siehst Du das? Unterscheiden die zwischen Household und Family Structure? Das wäre doch seltsam…

Die ASRM sagt: mindestens „one, term, uncomplicated pregnancy“. integration.asrm.org/globalassets...

Das ist, soweit ich weiß, in den guidelines der American Society for Reproductive Medicine festgeschrieben — lass mich mal nachschauen.

Ja, mich auch!