Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

It really sucks watching cis people try to write about the meta commentary about all this, not going to lie. Because any trans person could write about it at arms length in an ethical, journalistic and actually convey the stakes that we have to navigate but no one actually wants that.

Sydney Bauer

People want to create a veneer of good faith arguments in this because the second they get down to the granular biological realities they sound like nutjobs and it’s because when you’re getting that intricate in the human body about sport categorization you’re a fucking nutjob.

Обсуждение

3 прямых ответов · 4 сообщений

(And the reason that nobody wants that is they’d have to sit with actually hearing what watching a decade of rights erosions marketed as well meaning questions does to a population and it’s not fucking pretty.)

well yeah because YUOR BIAS

Ответ для Kim McCauley

Awww crap :( forgot

I think "good faith just-asking-questions" is just "well bless your heart" veneer over the dozens of idiots last year creating accounts just to post "there are only two genders", and I'm not sure any ethical, journalistic take will change those minds- ...because Scientific American already tried.