Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

This is an incredible documentation of the systematic, intentional collapse of American health science, by Elizabeth Ginexi. open.substack.com/pub/elizabet...

I Wrote Research Funding Announcements for NIH for 22 Years. This Year They’ve Published 14How NIH went from 756 funding announcements to 14 in two years — and what it means for every disease that depends on federal researchopen.substack.com
Обсуждение

20 прямых ответов · 30 сообщений

Показаны не все ответы

Публичный счётчик показывает 21, а источник передал 20. Остальные ответы могли быть удалены, скрыты или не выданы публично.

This reminds me of the oak tree metaphor from Atlas Shrugged, albeit from different side than Rand thought. America is rotting from the inside, and soon the tree/country will collapse.

Tough read. What a shame. What a loss

In 2029-2033 we’ll publish by the billions.

Ответ для socalurker

That can't be real!?!?

THIS is so consequential.

Waiting on my Canadian citizenship! Been out of work long enough now that I refuse to wait it out more

Struck by how the funding announcements reached a peak in Trump's first term second year, but in Project 2025 Trump 2.0 they absolutely flipped the script. Like they'd just been waiting for the real opportunity to gut everything, which then presented itself.

I fear we are never coming back from this hegemonic suicide

Ответ для Sara Mitchell

you are not alone in this sentiment.

so, weird take by me. trump's response to covid was... wacko. i think you can explain it by hypothesizing that he was advised that a populace in fear of their health is easier to manipulate and control, and his admin was too inept to thread that needle (show strength, sow fear). /1

Ответ для jig

it's clear many of those advisors are still around, and i'm a bit focused on Navarro (because his takes are extremely wacko, and he apparently still has the ear of the pres.). for example, i believe Navarro is the source of trump's tariff strategy. /2

Ответ для jig

anyway, what they got wrong with covid, they're trying to double down on by disrupting healthcare in the US across a much broader scope, starting with research funding, but encompassing all preventative measures, pretty much across the board. /3

Ответ для jig

it seems pretty obvious they want a second chance at an epidemic. with trump, hard to differentiate ego from flamboyant authoritarianism, but the sales pitch to him definitely included: this time you can show you can handle epidemics best. /4

Ответ для jig

so, that's where i'm at. trump wants an epidemic redo, his advisors are stupid and/or intent on destruction of institutions, no matter what they are, because they feel like victims of... everything, and there's myopic stupidity all around. /end

Ответ для jig

I think it is simpler. The "alt right" thinkers believe the left controls culture and they need to seize the means of control. Scientists are part of the means of control and as they have no means to control them, they must be destroyed instead.

Ответ для jig

The man appointed to head NIH was an advocate for doing nothing and letting the virus do its thing, and against all measures that might have saved lives but harmed the economy.

So very hard to motivate to write new grant proposals.

Again the GOP is America’s enemy

This is exactly the kind of thing Democrats in Congress should be getting in front of the cameras and speaking about. If they want the American public to believe in them, they have to impart useful information to us, not grandstand.

Don't forget NIH also kind of just doesn't have money right now. They dont know how much they'll have now or later. Also, remember that the algorithms looking for no-no words are simple ctrl F functions. Those doge idiots confirmed it in their trials

It has been utterly depressing to open NIH funding announcement emails over the past year to see that the only entries are for terminations of existing programs. It's good to see hard data on just how bad the numbers really are.

OMFG that’s bad

AHHGG…( my friend did research there yrs ago ) I volunteered for a Polio study there )

Ugh

Breaks my heart,my daughter is applying for every science job she can find.

Seemingly, TheMoreImportant TheResults would correlate, TheFaster ThatResearch’s shut down! An assembly line’s only as efficient as quality&usefulness of what’s actually produced! Sooo😐Overproduction of WastefulUselessProducts Produces Pollution & WastesFiniteResources! Today Is Illogical

Science is being pushed back into the Dark Ages.

Ответ для SWA

In the US

Ответ для Dana Davis Phf’nD

US historically funded health programs in the developing world too. Those cuts are killing people.