Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

This belief will survive only until about thirty days into the rule of the next Israeli PM, at which point it’ll be clear that a new PM didn’t actually end the actions most Americans object to

Shibley Telhami

Keep telling yourself that… www.haaretz.com/opinion/2026...

Обсуждение

4 прямых ответов · 10 сообщений

I am curious how people are going to reconcile with things when he's gone but things aren't magically better

I’d go so far as to say - Americans are not going to shift their views on Israel substantially until a) the U.S. ends aid to Israel, at which point we’ll become indifferent or b) a coalition actually including Arab parties takes office

Ответ для Matthew Downhour

americans 1) aren’t going to ever know who the leader of israel is, unless they’re a sicko. they just don’t know stuff like that 2) if they do hear any news about israel, it will be in the context of trump accusing them of betraying us somehow, and uh that’s not going to make anyone less antisemitic

Ответ для Matthew Downhour

It reminds me a little of the tough on crime talk. Every politician in the '90s had to be tough on crime. That's how Israel is with aggressive foreign policy. Some are better than others, but they are all militaristic hardliners. Otherwise they'd never get elected.

Ответ для Matthew Downhour

A non-Netanyahu majority coalition will probably need the support of the Arab parties in some way, or it won't have a majority (which might keep Netanyahu in power)

Ответ для Gluten-free Seitan

Haven’t Bennett/Lapid promised *not* to enter into such a coalition?

Ответ для Matthew Downhour

Yes, but the math doesn't math otherwise. Which is why they broke that rule before. Ra'am was part of their coalition. Netanyahu had previously negotiated with the Islamist party www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-re...

Netanyahu reportedly offered Ra’am’s Abbas ‘exclusivity’ on Arab issues in coalitionArab Israeli lawmaker said to have been approached by Shas chief Aryeh Deri on behalf of ex-PM last year in a last-ditch effort to prevent Bennett's 'change government'www.timesofisrael.com

i get the sense that any israeli pm would have done this scale of ethnic cleansing, but only he would've interfered in american politics as crudely as he has over the past ~15 yrs, and it's only down to the cowardice of old-school democrats that they've put up with it this long.

Ответ для Microplastics Sommelier

a more skillful pm wouldn't have made alienating one of the US's two political parties a lifelong personal mission, and it'll likely turn out to have been a major unforced error in the long run

Real Putin/Navalny situation here where people would have the same problems with Navalny, he'd just be less corrupt while doing it