Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Предыдущая публикация

She wasn't a Graham Platner, that's for sure. I like that my issues with her are ideological, and it's why I wasn't *too* worried about what would happen if she won (not thrilled about her stance on I/P). She swung and missed, that's admirable. Will Stancil did the same. But c'mon. Endorse Biss.

130

I think she’s a grifter. At the very least some form of craven narcissist. Something about her as the campaign progressed just disturbed me on a gut level.

Обсуждение

1 прямых ответов · 5 сообщений

I think that has a lot to do with why she lost. She never seemed to take it seriously enough. Which is absolutely proven true by her refusal to endorse the candidate that won the primary. If you're trying to run as a Dem, you need to help Dems if you fall short. She picked up her ball and went home.

Ответ для Head Engineer - Blinky Light Dept.

The “narcoleptic” episode when she was with Hasan Piker and fundraising in LA and forgot to meet with her prospective constituents really sealed the deal. It wasn’t just flighty it felt grossly opportunistic to me. Like every rich kid I had to endure.

Ответ для Adam “TurboLib” Sessler 🇺🇦
Ответ для Head Engineer - Blinky Light Dept.

Started when she blew and and dissed Jan Schakowsky before she announced her retirement as old and out of touch. (I'll give her old.) But she has one of the most progressive voting records in Congress and did it while not alienating the non-progs in her district or her colleagues.

Ответ для Bobby Blue Byrd

*blew in dammit