Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

←

Публикация

Предыдущая публикация
Carl T. Bergstrom

23. Scattered throughout are appeals to finding from my field—the science of science / metascience that point to problems with some of the the existing norms and institutions that undergird academic science. Some of these are taken out of context, others are presented reasonably fairly. But...

1678
Carl T. Bergstrom

24. Essentially, the report cites metascientists as observing that there's might be raccoon in the attic, and then concludes that the best course of action is to burn down the entire house. This is inconsistent with virtually all of the scholarship in this area.

Обсуждение

1 прямых ответов · 14 сообщений

Carl T. Bergstrom

25. We can build a new, better house, the report proposes. We'll have VC principles and markets and agentic AI doing microtransactions on the blockchain, it gushes. But the report offers nothing by way of a plan for how any of this would work. It's just an excuse to get out the flamethrower.

Ответ для Carl T. Bergstrom
Carl T. Bergstrom

26. In summary? A disastrous and incoherent jumble that might sound good, one paragraph at a time, to a president who is not known for deep thought or a politics major accustomed to judging pitch decks, but falls woefully short as serious thought let alone rigorous planning for a national future.

Ответ для Carl T. Bergstrom
PombeDoc

Unroll @unroll.skywriter.blue

Ответ для Carl T. Bergstrom
Carl T. Bergstrom

27. A final aspect that probably deserves mention: the Rufo playbook of kneecapping government institutions, then complaining that they are inefficient and using that as rationale to eliminate them. The majority of things this report identifies as broken are things the Trump administration broke.

Ответ для Carl T. Bergstrom
tempura13

Willing to bet La Sapienza and La Sorbonne are both looking on with horror and relieved that their institutions are irrevocably state institutions.

Ответ для Carl T. Bergstrom
Ответ для Carl T. Bergstrom
Carl T. Bergstrom

28. To everyone who should know better but is still saying "actually, I agree with this one point in the report" or "to be fair Kratsios is right about this" — I give you Derek Lowe's reponse.

The Assault On Science Funding Continueswww.science.org
Ответ для Carl T. Bergstrom
Craig Kaplan

@himself.bsky.social

Ответ для Carl T. Bergstrom
Patrick McCray

It's the same strategy with national parks; defund them until they look like shit and then privatize them. Everything being sold for parts.

Ответ для Patrick McCray
Guitarcoyote108

Asset stripping.

Ответ для Patrick McCray
Ответ для Carl T. Bergstrom
Mark D. Garfinkel, Ph.D.

“Kneecapping, then complaining about ineffectiveness” as a pretext for dismantlement isn’t only Rufo’s playbook. It’s Russell Vought’s playbook. It’s Grover Norquist’s playbook. They are arsonists. They are like Steve Bannon, a self-styled Leninist. “Some people just want to watch the world burn.”

Ответ для Carl T. Bergstrom
Everyday.Human Derek

It's worse than my jumbling, which is staggering to me. This admin not only spouts bullshit, im pretty sure they mainline it. The only advantage I see is this is a great teaching/learning moment.