Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Предыдущая публикация

“journalism as fourth estate, truth to power, informing the public, valuing free speech”. I’m sorry, but I fail to see why the expectation of any and all of these things by the media is too much to ask. But I’m in my 50s so I grew up in an era of serious and unwavering news reporting.

11185

Oh yes, the salad days of Judith Miller.

Обсуждение

2 прямых ответов · 7 сообщений

No, the honest days of Walter Cronkite.

Ответ для Democracy Matters

Individual journalists aside, Chomsky wasn’t bullshitting when he wrote Manufacturing Consent. He was describing a very real phenomenon. Today’s sycophants may be a degree worse, but let’s not let that cloud our memory of what the corporate media has always been about.

Ответ для Ryan Carson

It’s several significant degrees worse now.

Bezos didn’t own the Washington Post. There was less deleterious consolidation all around. Fox News was founded in 1996 (I was 28, now 58), at the very start of widespread internet. It wasn’t ideal, and news media *really* should have been re-regulated post-Reagan, but it was better than it is now.

Ответ для S. Grisham

A fuckton better than now. Independently run, ad-funded media, not billionaire owned outlets who are told to spout lies.

Ответ для joannerochester

While there was an age where things were better, I think it’s important to note that before that it was worse in pretty much the same way it is today. Media being owned by a small number of super rich people is the historical norm, an independent industry was a hard fought exception.

Ответ для Three👁️Eyed👁️Devil👁️

I hear you and agree to an extent, however I personally don't remember a time when major US media consistently failed across the board to report honestly on a particular individual for fear of being sued or having their broadcast licences threatened with revocation by the FCC.