This German court (see thread) held that output from "AI" products are "independent, new, and substantive" relative to the inputs (thus liability of Google; no Sec-230-like protection) and that such algorithmic outputs are not entitled to free speech protection. Not sure how this jives with US law.
Jed BrownThis is interesting to contrast with the xAI lawsuit against Colorado over SB24-205. I think the laundering of liability for illegal and defamatory output is far more valuable to companies, but it would be a cherry on top if US courts also say such algorithmic output shall not receive 1A protection.