Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Предыдущая публикация

No, we need to protect the rule of law.

262

That starts by forcefully removing a ton of corrupt politicians. When we can do that, *then* rule of law means something. Until then, it's just keeping the status quo where the rich get away with everything, and citizens get brutalized for looking at a cop wrong.

Обсуждение

Ответы

“Forcefully” sure doesn’t sound like rule of law at all, you squirrelly ass cartoon.

Ответ для Noel Keith

They are criminals in the first place and still sitting in charge of deciding who's a criminal. Removing them forcefully would *be* rule of law. We have one sitting senator who's being given the "Weekend at Bernie's" treatment just to keep a different person from the seat.