Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Предыдущая публикация

Under the CEU bottleneck model, we observed consistently minor effects of phasing errors. The difference between ARG inference methods is much larger than the difference in performance between using true haplotypes and computationally phased haplotypes. 5/7

100

Under a selective sweep model, we saw little difference in branch-length-based diversity between ARGs inferred from true and computationally phased haplotypes, demonstrating the practicality of applying ARGs inferred from unphased data in evolutionary analyses. 6/7

Обсуждение

1 прямых ответов

Overall, ARG inference tools have demonstrated remarkable robustness to computational phasing errors. While various practical challenges may limit ARG inference quality, we believe that computational phasing inaccuracies should not be a problem of concern. 7/7