Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Предыдущая публикация

No one can search your phone without a warrant, unless you voluntarily unlock the phone for them. This case comes up against the 4th amendment and the need for actual probable cause to seize a phone. This person was a suspected criminal, this doesn't apply for every American. We can/should say no.

200

This will require further study because this seems to focus on Graphene OS but he didn't need to use a duress password, they could have seized an iPhone or Google phone and it can be wiped remotely from home before they get a search warrant but if you're a suspected criminal, this raises suspicion.

Обсуждение

1 прямых ответов · 8 сообщений

Remote wipe requires you to be able to connect to a system to initiate it or to be able to call someone who can. Wishful thinking if you are in a holding room with no cell signal essentially waiting to be granted entry to the us. Context is everything.

Ответ для Mark Cathcart

I meant when you get home. You're not sitting in jail w/o bail options over refusing to unlock your phone. There are no laws that can trump your Constitutional Rights and you are protected from search and seizure (they will seize anyway and you have to sue to get it back sometimes).

Ответ для Proud Grandpa (2x)!

You've clearly never been pulled aside landing at a US Airport and been left sitting in a completely empty room the size of an accessible toilet stall that has no cell service, no wifi, no telephone etc. You are not legally in the United States and just have to wait...

Ответ для Mark Cathcart

Thanks for playing there's the law and there's what actually happens. Yes, it's unlikely to happen, but you can be detained until they let you go home. Just hope this never happens to you or anyone you care for. see also arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026...

Forgot your Google password? Now you can log in with a selfie.Google's selfie videos can be used for account access, AI Avatars, and age verification.arstechnica.com
Ответ для Mark Cathcart

Yup, they might detain you but they need to have probable cause of an actual crime at some point, that's why they came up with these BS charges over something they do not have the jurisdiction to do. They are twisting a SCOTUS ruling and it's in the courts. This is Trump/Project 2025.

Ответ для Mark Cathcart

Trump is trying to argue that you are not in the United States. You are in the United States. Just because Trump says something, doesn't mean it's true. He, they, are trying to make these arguments right now in court. Now that it's in the limelight, those cops are going to have to provide all 1/

Ответ для Proud Grandpa (2x)!

evidence that they collected to make them think they had enough probable cause to violate his Constitutional rights to begin with (this is already in the courts, and this would have to wait). If they don't have that, they don't have a case. There's no evidence of a crime, just that they 2/

Ответ для Proud Grandpa (2x)!

want the laws protecting people from flushing coke down a toilet to apply to our personal cell phones. This bullying tactic is how they get you to voluntarily give up your rights. This guy regularly protested Cop City and was already on the entire Atlanta PDs shit list. 3/3