Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

←

Публикация

Предыдущая публикация
Rick Hills

I am confused. Peer review, at least for NIH grant applications, is required by statute (42 USC sec 289a) Rules cannot repeal statutes. Standing to challenge illegal grant review process seems easy. So what’s Vought’s legal play here? www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/...

42 U.S. Code § 289a - Peer review requirementswww.law.cornell.edu
481
It's ME(Jaime)

Nobody has actually answered this, so: they're not forbidding peer review. They're saying it doesn't count. After peer review, it would go to Vought or some other flunky, who'd make a final determination. There's even instruction not to rely on or reference the peer review.

Обсуждение

Ответы

Загружаем ответы…