Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

A new and yet unknown Ukrainian drone type has been used last night. Looks like a small version of the F-117.

Обсуждение

29 прямых ответов · 41 сообщений

Показаны не все ответы

Публичный счётчик показывает 30, а источник передал 29. Остальные ответы могли быть удалены, скрыты или не выданы публично.

Soon: F 117, known as a large version of a Ukrainian drone

Blended wing for enhanced endurance and potentially lower observability. From memory the downsides are it's harder to make it aerodynamically stable and it has lower manoeuvrability Vs traditional designs. Plane nerds please correct me.

Ответ для richdickins

These shapes are usually not stable by themselves and need automatic corrections constantly just to fly in a straight line So there’s additional sensors and electronics needed just to let it fly alone

Ответ для Lucas van Dongen - Swift developer

As unstable as „normal“ FPV quadcopters. Flight computers that cope with that are standard and inexpensive, also for winged flight. Also, aerodynamically unstable configurations often come with better maneuverability.

Ответ для richdickins

The vertical rudder and tail at 90 degrees will hit the RCS. It's why stealth aircraft have a V tail or no tail at all.

Ответ для Matthew Newell 🇺🇦

I suspect Ukraine is working on V tail version, but whatever works is good enough to blow up targets while they perfect the design.

Ответ для Jarno Niemelä

I'm not sure stealth is that big a deal for a drone. They already make a lawnmower sound. If stealth was a big deal you'd want to silence them. They are small, probably have a small image just from that and even if not, here's a lot more incoming. With an aircraft you have a human pilot at risk.

It's pretty clear to me what that is...

Ответ для Flying Dutchman

Stealth drone 😀

FP-117

Ooh, interesting...

I believe that's the ruskibuster 2000, designed and build by the karma company.

F

There are some unconfirmed reports that this is the Bravo drone: dev.ua/en/news/dips... I am not sure how reliable this is but it would make sense.

Ukraine has developed a new deep strike drone with a range of 2,000 kmUkrainian deftech company Triada Robotics has developed the Bravo deepstrike drone with a maximum range of 2,000 km.dev.ua

As long as it makes a big boom in russia, it’s the bomb.

are there any corroborating sources?

Ответ для Chris

Yes. Monkeys definitely exist.

No f117 has a twin tail in order to avoid 90 degree angles. This one does not.

i propose these shadowy low-obserable fu be known as the "Night Witches of wildberry"

We've seen kites like that flown at the beach.

The world can see now that Ukrainians are a brilliant, resourceful people. And Donald Trump is a criminal controlled by the Epstein Files and Putin.

It should be named “The Noberry”.

If they're going for stealth, they need to do something about the rudder. But perhaps that causes production difficulties.

Ответ для Major Kong to Ground Control

Stabilisers could be made of thin plywood. As someone mentioned above. It’s a one way trip. Plus there’s no need for high g manoeuvres. Thin birch ply is remarkably strong and has some degree of transparency to radar.

Ответ для woodwizard

I was thinking something like that

Except the f-117 has a V-tail for reduced radar cross section. Right angles love to reflect back to sender…

Ответ для Banana Joe

Yes, but a one way drone doesn't need high strength internal structural members that will last thousands of flight hours, so the stabilizers of the drone can be made out of low reflectivity synthetic materials.

Batman has sent a few new toys to be tested. On a serious note, might be a hybrid stealth development in progress.