Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Good morning, surveillance state! tech.yahoo.com/cybersecurit...

License Plate Cameras Now Track Your Phone, Wearables, and… Your PetsLicense plate cameras with SignalTrace now harvest Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and RFID data from your devices, building trackable fingerprints with no federal law to stop it.tech.yahoo.com
Обсуждение

1 прямых ответов · 7 сообщений

I call bullshit on tracking pet microchips, if not specifically built for long range operation, tags have a range of a few inches. Carwash, parking, and HOV/pay lane tags will be picked up.

Ответ для Robert Szasz 𓅆

I raised my eyebrows at that, too, since it's not unusual for vets/rescues using scanners to miss a microchip that's migrated. I read that either as a poorly chosen example of the type of tag that can be identified or a badly described GPS tag for pet collars.

Ответ для Libby

They definitely say RFID tags, but yeah, that's not happening with barely one inch range on pet RFID chips. GPS or fitness trackers use BT. Totally feasible. And unnecessary, because they will already have tracked your smartphone when you walk your dogs. Any of this should be completely illegal.

Ответ для mac_b52

Getting access to fitness trackers and pet collar data requires warrants or very expensive contracts. A network of passive data harvesters breaks no current laws, and has fewer points for renegotiations.

Ответ для Robert Szasz 𓅆

That's what I meant. Even passive tracking should be illegal. Years ago this was a large discussion for then-new 3G networks over here in Germany, and now everybody just collects that data.

Ответ для mac_b52

You would think! Since law enforcement routinely buys info from commercial data scrapers that they wouldn't be able to get a warrant for, there's a whole lot of fashy fingers that want to get in that pie.

Ответ для Libby

I know it isn't, but it really, really should be.