Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Предыдущая публикация

Btw, the paper used as example here is our recent paper "Are Widely Known Findings Easier to Retract?" now published in @philscijournal.bsky.social Check it out here: www.cambridge.org/core/journal... bsky.app/profile/cail...

Are Widely Known Findings Easier to Retract? | Philosophy of Science | Cambridge CoreAre Widely Known Findings Easier to Retract?www.cambridge.orgCailin O’Connor

Retractions in science don't work well. In our *new paper* we find widely known findings are easier to retract, possibly bc the retraction is relevant to more people, allowing information about it to spread socially @jevinwest.bsky.social @shahanmemon.bsky.social www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

141

Some other interesting initiatives/tools I encountered recently around paper reading and sensemaking. 1. papiers.ai 2. www.connectedpapers.com 3. chromewebstore.google.com/detail/googl... 4. Graphical abstracts: www.elsevier.com/researcher/a...

Papiers – Research WorkspacePapiers is an AI-native workspace for reading, organizing, and sharing research.papiers.ai
Обсуждение

0 прямых ответов

Ответов пока нет

Обсуждение ещё не началось.