Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Megathread about responding to new OMB grant funding rules (feel free to add/link more!) I was collecting these for me, but figured I'd round 'em up for everyone 🧪 What's the problem? arstechnica.com/science/2026... elizabethginexi.substack.com/p/summary-of...

Proposed new US funding rules: We can cancel any grant at any timePeer review now optional, political staff would screen grants for forbidden topics.arstechnica.com
Обсуждение

Ответы

He needs to go asap

Definitely agree on writing comments, I'd also suggest writing a letter to the editor. Environmental groups have really been pushing this as we navigate these everything is awful times. Supposedly politicians still read them. Don't know if it actually accomplishes anything but certainly can't hurt.

Fiction Right? villains.fandom.com/wiki/Vought_...

Vought InternationalThat is our job, our honor. We are Vought. We make heroes super.Madelyn Stillwell Today's heroes. Tomorrow's future.Vought's official slogan[1]. Vought International, formerly Vought American, or simp...villains.fandom.com

Keeping track of these massive OMB shifts is a full-time job! 🤯 Thanks for rounding up these vital links. 🧪 Let’s dive deep into the fine print and stay ahead of the game together! 🧬✨

More thoughts and a good resource guide from @matthewcort.land bsky.app/profile/matt...

Matthew Cortland (they)

1/ 🧵 OMB is advancing a proposed rule that would destroy the American scientific enterprise. Randos keep disagreeing with my 'here's how to fight it' I do this for a living. So before the "how," here's the "who" --- and why you should listen to me on this one.

Ответ для Annika Barber

In this follow-on 🧵, he has a bunch of specific suggestions on how, why, + where to target group comments too:

Matthew Cortland (they)

BY SUBMITTING A GROUP COMMENT, YOU CAN BE MORE OF A HEAVY HITTER. "The Comment of 19 PIs whose labs have 497 patents related to the treatment of disease" IS FUCKING LITIGATION GOLD. 🧵

Ответ для Annika Barber

Resources from @standupforscience.net bsky.app/profile/cdel...

Colette Delawalla, PhD

ALRIGHT EVERYONE HERE IS THE OFFICIAL SUFS GUIDE TO LEAVING PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE OMB-2026-0034 PROPOSED RULE: www.standupforscience.foundation/policy-and-advocacy/the-sufs-guide-to-writing-public-comments (share with all your friends!)

What should you do? WRITE A SPECIFIC, SUBSTANTIVE COMMENT about the OMB proposed changes. And ask your department, school, scientific society, colleagues, and union to do so as well. 🧪 Comment submission link: www.regulations.gov/commenton/OM...

Regulations.govwww.regulations.gov
Ответ для Annika Barber

Writing is hard and scary, but people are here to help! 🧪 Guidelines from @elizabethginexi.bsky.social: elizabethginexi.substack.com/p/what-we-ne... Template from @jeremymberg.bsky.social:https://jeremymberg.github.io/jeremyberg.github.io/OMB%20comment%20template-5-30-26.docx

What We Need to do NEXT: OMB’s Proposed Federal Financial Assistance Rule (OMB-2026-0034)What OMB’s Proposed Federal Financial Assistance Rule Means in Practiceelizabethginexi.substack.com
Ответ для Annika Barber

The OMB’s proposed changes directly impact our research integrity and funding 🧬. We must defend scientific rigor! Please submit a substantive comment now ✍️ and urge your department and colleagues to join this vital effort! 🧪✨

The government deciding how government money is spent should not be all that controversial. The real question is: can there be a healthy research system under a rotten government?

This is horrifying and how fascism starts …

Ответ для Sylvain Giroud

We are well past the “start” of fascism.