Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

←

Публикация

Предыдущая публикация
theviewfromorbit

The trouble appears to have been that Starmer didn't have a faction of his own. And if there's one thing factionalists don't like it's someone who refuses on principle to play their games.

190
Paul Singh 🇪🇺🇬🇧

Yes but I think that the recent cabinet changes have created a pro Starmer faction

Обсуждение

4 прямых ответов · 6 сообщений

Ianrobo

or so many united against Burnham ... and yes getting coronated does that and he fucked up some of the dismissals, PM's allowed to have their own people but treat people with dignity and what he did to Reeves was abysmal, surprised her sister took AG (though unqualified)

Tracey

Well, that's what happens if the new leader who spent a year undermining the PM/MPs now pushes them out in favour of the loyalists aka plotters that helped park him in Downing Street. That's why it matters how you become PM.

theviewfromorbit

Indeed. Which itself is a grim irony, as I don't think the man himself would've wanted such an outcome.

Paul Singh 🇪🇺🇬🇧

But tbh it’s all so fucking second rate It’s embarrassing. People need to get a grip of themselves & realise the real enemy is Farage not people who believe in a slightly different left wing pathway

Ответ для Paul Singh 🇪🇺🇬🇧
Paul Singh 🇪🇺🇬🇧

Frankly i‘m embarrassed by the state of the Labour Party.

Ответ для Paul Singh 🇪🇺🇬🇧
Get Me Zarniwoop

It would have been nice if they could have got a grip of themselves before forcing out the duly elected leader of the Labour Party, and Prime Minister with a clear five-year mandate; without consulting the party membership.