Danielle Kurtzleben25 июл., 22:10But that’s not “needing” MAHA. That’s recognizing that it’s good to meet people where they are. Anyway did I fall for a headline designed to make me angry? Yes. Shit.
Danielle Kurtzleben25 июл., 22:21Like maybe the headline could be “public health can reach MAHA followers.” But that’s way less sexy.
*puts on flower crown, falls into a faerie circle*26 июл., 07:37grumpy old (44) person viewpoint I fucking hate that headlines are clickbait/ragebait anymore print newspaper headlines told you what was going on every online headline the past 20+ years is there to leave you uninformed until you click through
Tina25 июл., 22:30You're 100% right, because instead of setting this up to be a useful story they're just saying, fuck it, we're gonna go for the hate clicks and that's just scummy behavior.
Jon Rosenfield25 июл., 22:37I feel like many “what the WHAT?!?!” headlines are disconnected from the underlying story, & are just there to appease the fascists. Which means editors are gaslighting us, & mostly not journalists. They know the MAGA-crowd won’t read the article. Editors: DON’T DO THIS 👆. Headlines become “news”.
markmcan25 июл., 22:45Most people don't realise that sub-editors - and also automated A/B testing systems - write the headlines and titles without the author's input. Causes some furious arguments
Alice Lastname26 июл., 04:10I think if journalists aren't allowed to write/have final approval on their headlines, the person who does write it must be credited
NCSteve26 июл., 05:13I think you're only pretending to miss the point of why that didn't happen centuries ago.
Clever Handle Here dba Todd Kehoe25 июл., 22:24There’s a lesson of “heed good-faith criticism or else you might get subsumed by bad-faith criticism” that a whole lot of institutions are (hopefully) learning currently
