Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

←

Публикация

Предыдущая публикация
Institute for Replication

Questions about the credibility and cumulative nature of economic research have never been more central. This issue brings together work assessing the robustness of published findings, documenting research practices, and synthesizing evidence across studies.

100
Institute for Replication

We welcome five types of contributions: 1️⃣ Replications & reproductions of influential or policy-relevant work, incl. large-scale or coordinated efforts 2️⃣ Meta-analyses, meta-science & systematic reviews 3️⃣ Research on barriers to reproducibility & biases in knowledge generation

Обсуждение

1 прямых ответов · 3 сообщений

Institute for Replication

4️⃣ Methodological papers: new tools for assessing robustness, synthesizing evidence, or improving transparency — incl. pre-analysis plans & pre-specification 5️⃣ Survey articles taking stock of what we've learned about reproducibility, replication & meta-science

Ответ для Institute for Replication
Institute for Replication

We also invite short commentaries (<4,000 words) informed by recent developments in the economics meta-scientific community. These are typically solicited — but you can email a proposal (max 500 words) to request an invitation to contribute.