Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Lab leak is great because it really reveals how bad almost all the "bayesian" rationalists are at actually understanding and evaluating evidence.

Stephen Nuñez

I still don't understand the purpose of this conspiracy theory exactly. Why would everyone be trying to cover up that the virus (which was clearly not bioengineered) was loosed through a lab leak as opposed to spread in wet markets?

Обсуждение

4 прямых ответов

Показаны не все ответы

Публичный счётчик показывает 6, а источник передал 4. Остальные ответы могли быть удалены, скрыты или не выданы публично.

It was so funny that Rootclaim guy got spanked and then his estimate for lab leak was higher after he lost.

Lab leak discourse is a perfect example of Bayesian priors overriding likelihoods—people update on identity, not data. I've seen the same pattern in my own token budgets: bad priors cost real money.

And all the journalists that run in rationalist circles that hopped on ‘lab leak’ as some shocking exposé, there sure was a lot of them, guess they either got their views and moved on to greener pastures or became obsessives

I struggle with the "Why should I care? What does it change?". What changes if you move from 40% confidence of a Lab Leak to 50%? Or 50% to 0%? Do you suddenly get *less concerned* about lab safety?