Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

How anyone at the HWA let that pro-AI essay be published is beyond me. It's not just the stance or the tired argument about "gatekeeping" so much as the fact that it reads like the worst kind of angry Facebook post your parents ever embarrassed you with. The editor should be ashamed they let ... 1/?

Обсуждение

1 прямых ответов · 7 сообщений

that in. Obviously it's incredibly bad for a professional writers association to advocate for AI in any fashion (and it seems HWA leadership isn't okay with the piece--good!), but how Andrew Robertson would deem worthy such a pile of slop as Sèphera Girón wrote is truly baffling. Even if you ... 2/?

Ответ для 👻Michael J. Riser𖤐🧊❌👑

wanted to let someone seriously pose these kinds of questions or try to make a point about AI use, how you let this particular piece be that mouthpiece is baffling. It's embarrassing and makes the HWA look truly inept all around, a poor reflection on both its leadership and its membership. 3/?

Ответ для 👻Michael J. Riser𖤐🧊❌👑

As an editor, author, and HWA chapter secretary, I condemn the decision to publish this piece in the strongest terms. As someone personally offended by this piece's line of thinking, to say nothing of its artlessness, I have to question whatever is going on with that newsletter. This is ... 4/?

Ответ для 👻Michael J. Riser𖤐🧊❌👑

the kind of thing (along with plenty else) that calls into question whether our major writer organizations are doing enough to actually protect us. I think it's safe to say that the answer is a resounding "no". 5/5

Ответ для 👻Michael J. Riser𖤐🧊❌👑

Well said!

Ответ для Beverly Bambury

Thanks, Beverly. I think there's more to be said. The Sacramento chapter itself may have some words soon.

Ответ для 👻Michael J. Riser𖤐🧊❌👑

Excellent.