Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

←

Публикация

Nicholas Wu

Q&A story by @nature.com on how @biologyopen.bsky.social found that paying reviewers cut time to first decisions by 85% while maintaining or even improving review quality. Q&A 🔗 www.nature.com/articles/d41... Pre-print 🔗: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

Обсуждение

1 прямых ответов

Eric Maugendre about emissions

You may suspect that the two journals have interest in pushing money bound. Many reviewers would be happy to be paid. This would participate in the trend to pay researchers per task, not for their status.