Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

←

Публикация

Nick Huntington-Klein

i think there are a lot of people who would find it very hard to believe that the field of economics could produce this paper. and yet! Acemoglu is like the mainstreamest and most successful economist working today. some priors could use an update. www.nber.org/papers/w35336

Automation and RepressionFounded in 1920, the NBER is a private, non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to conducting economic research and to disseminating research findings among academics, public policy makers, an...www.nber.org
Обсуждение

Ответы

Damien Gimenez

Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson’s originality lies in bringing political science back into mainstream economics. They analyse political and social conflict through Hobbesian anthropology and game theory: institutions emerge from struggles over power and credible threats.

Erez Yoeli

I think his opinion on this is pretty far from the profession’s mainstream.

Michael Kevane

All the better to lull you into false consciousness, they say ;-)

John Jost

Maybe Marx was the first evolutionary game theorist.

Rafe Meager (they/them)

I had missed this! Nice to see Daron in his element again

Ответ для Rafe Meager (they/them)
Pietro Biroli

His element being dictatorship and repression? If you meant it as a compliment.... ;)

Ben Hanowell

He should collaborate with Peter Turchin to extend this model to account for the effect of elite oversupply by adding a module that scales the effect based on human capital investment and the strength, sign, and shape of the link between human capital investment and automation.

Trending Socks

All good points and also Acemoglu has cautioned about the distributional effects of automation for several years. This takes that caution back to his roots in political economy and I'm a surprisingly Marxian way.

Patrick Brennan

so much for fully automated gay communism