Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

←

Публикация

Предыдущая публикация
Vote for hope in November! Toitū te Tiriti 🇳🇿

Working in advertising I remember the beginnings of this around the turn of the century, being asked by photog to sign a time limited contract for some work. Back then any commissioned photography was considered the property of the client.

100
Mike Dickison

Because it was (and still is). The photographer can ask to contract out of that, but the client doesn’t have to accept it.

Обсуждение

1 прямых ответов · 3 сообщений

Rob

Yep , this is from 12 years ago and is relevant and clear If you are an employee and taking photos is your job you are being paid to do your employer owns the copyright If you are a wedding tog etc you will have a contract that hopefully states specifics www.laneneave.co.nz/news-events/...

Photography Law in New ZealandWe explore the many unique aspects of photography law, from who owns copyright to infringements and moral rights.www.laneneave.co.nz
Ответ для Rob
Mike Dickison

That’s a nice overview. And there’s a post from just last week making the same points I’ve made above. www.laneneave.co.nz/news-events/...

The Copyright Trap for Creators in New ZealandCopyright is not always clear cut, especially when creating content or works "on commission" in New Zealand. Find out more.www.laneneave.co.nz
Ответ для Rob
Chris Werry

Same with architectural plans. My parents donated the plans of their 1970's John Scott house to the National Library who refuses to make them available online because of "copyright issues". Contracting out was virtually unheard in the 1970's + John was bankrupt at the time so....